[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tim Polk's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-imapext-i18n-15.txt




On 3/7/08 at 1:03 PM +0000, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

I've suggested addition of the following text:
  If the server discovers that it doesn't support any language other
  than i-default, it MUST return a tagged NO response to the
  enumeration request.

If we're going to add that, also saying that one MUST NOT advertise language if you don't support other than i-default is silly. If the client must deal with the case of a NO response to the enumeration request, then it won't have a problem. And I think Ned's point about not knowing until after CAPABILITIES time that you don't have more than one language is well taken.

Again, I don't see the big deal about a client dealing with a LANGUAGE response containing only i-default, but if we really don't like that, I think the above is a sufficient change.

pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102