[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SORT document, draft -20




Mark Crispin wrote:

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

But this contradict the text you already have in section 7:

OK, how about this in section 7:

   As stated in the introduction, the rules of I18NLEVEL=1 as described
   in [IMAP-I18N] MUST be followed; that is, the SORT and THREAD
   extensions MUST collate strings according to the i;unicode-casemap
   collation described in [UNICASEMAP].  Servers SHOULD also advertise
   the I18NLEVEL=1 extension.

   As discussed in [IMAP-I18N] section 4.5, all server implementations
   should eventually be updated to support the [IMAP-I18N] I18NLEVEL=2
   extension.

This looks better.

Can this text being read as saying that I18NLEVEL=1 requirements override I18NLEVEL=2 requirements (in the case when I18NLEVEL=2 is also implemented by the server)?