[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CONDSTORE: STORE UNCHANGEDSINCE 0



On Mar 13, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

Timo Sirainen wrote:

What happened to this?

I need to publish CONDSTOREbis draft at some point which contains the fix. I don't have time or energy to do this now. I should find some time once all my Lemonade drafts are approved for publication.

Are there going to be other changes? The main problem I currently have implementing CONDSTORE is that I'd rather not want to figure out HIGHESTMODSEQ value when selecting a mailbox unless I know the client wants to use CONDSTORE. I started to wonder if it would work nicely if a SELECT mailbox returned [NOMODSEQ] but the first CONDSTORE enabling command would cause * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ n] to be sent.

Which also brings to my mind.. I didn't really understand why the * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ n] would be sent again after it was already sent as a reply to SELECT. This is described in the spec example 5 and also happens in your implementation.

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part