Re: [lemonade] Even more drastic cut-backs in METADATA

[Dan Karp <dkarp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> So here is a more radical proposal: do away with .priv and .shared as
> well.  Instead each annotation would define whether it is per-user or
> shared.  So on a mailbox we would initially define:
> 
>   /comment-public
>   /comment-private
> 
> Where "public" would be "shared" and "private" would be per-user.

I really like this, as there are very, very few entries that are
meaningful as both private and public.

How does this affect the statement from section 3.3 of the old document:

   If the METADATA extension is present, support for shared annotations
   is REQUIRED, whilst support for private annotations is OPTIONAL.