Re: IMAPEXT prepared for shutdown

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> > Our last RFC has posted, and I judge no energy left (at least in this 
> > group at this time) to go forward with ACL2, so I am hereby 
> > requesting the shutdown of the Internet Message Access Protocol 
> > Extension Working Group. We can leave the mailing list alive.
>
> I suppose this means Mark blocked ACL2 for long enough to make the 
> block  effectively permanent.

This is not correct. The main reason is that the editor ran out of 
time/energy and considering other IETF committments can't get ACL2 finished.

> I don't mind as a practical matter (ACL does most of what I need), but 
> somehow I don't like it.
>
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 ∞. Small values of infinity suck, 
> even when they don't hurt very much in practice.