Re: IMAP extensions needed for SPAM/HAM and WHITE/BLACK listing

[Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:21 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 3. manually flagged as spam
> 4. manually flagged as non-spam
> 
> Where 1 and 2 / 3 and 4 are mutually exclusive but 1 + 4 and 2 + 3  
> should trigger retraining of baysian filters etc.

The keywords I'm describing are intended to tell the server to process
the flagged message through its filters (i.e. train on the message). It
isn't relevant to the proposal whether a human sets them, just what the
server's behaviour is in their presence.

--lyndon