Re: Comments on protocol-02

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 06:18 PM 7/26/00 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>In sections 5.2 and 5.5, StartReplicationResponse and End
>ReplicationResponse are defined as extended requests
>  ::= [APPLICATION 23]
>
>Why are they not categorized as extended responses?  This is
>rather counterintuitive.  The framing draft as proposed had
>requests and responses defined correctly, but gave
>request/response pairs different OIDs.  This is also
>counter-intuitive, as other extended operations use the same
>OID on the request and response.

I suggest the no OID be specified with the response as
it clear by the semantics of the protocol that it is
paired with the request (this is, after all, why it is
OPTIONAL).  Or follow the StartTLS example and use the
same OID for paired request and responses (the OID
identifies the "operation" instead of the PDU).

Kurt