[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: draft-ietf-ldup-replica-req-04.txt

This was intentional because the current draft had expired and needed to
be re-issused so it can be updated from people's comments.
Ellen


At 12:38 AM 8/4/00 +1000, Albert Langer wrote:
The attached document is 03 and has no significant differences from 02.

Is that intentional?

Now I'm REALLY curious as to the outcome of the Pittsburg discussion.

Could somebody who was there PLEASE provide an unofficial description?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Russel F Weiser
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:03 PM
To: internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx; ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx; Ellen Stokes
Subject: draft-ietf-ldup-replica-req-04.txt


This is a updated version of the replication requirements document.
requested by the LDUP working group to be updated.
cheers
RFW