[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
This was intentional because the current draft had expired and needed to
be re-issused so it can be updated from people's comments.
At 12:38 AM 8/4/00 +1000, Albert Langer wrote:
The attached document is 03 and has no significant differences from 02.
Is that intentional?
Now I'm REALLY curious as to the outcome of the Pittsburg discussion.
Could somebody who was there PLEASE provide an unofficial description?
[mailto:owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Russel F Weiser
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:03 PM
To: internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx; ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx; Ellen Stokes
This is a updated version of the replication requirements document.
requested by the LDUP working group to be updated.