Question on LCUP

[jukka.aakula@xxxxxxxxx]

Hi,

I have a question on LCUP scalability.

Shall the LCUP be scalable on number of persistent search requests ?

I suppose the main use of LCUP is the following:

	The client caches a well defined subset ( like one 
	subtree ) of the directory. 

Then there is propably only one or some Persistent Searches
per client ?

But suppose the client keeps a more dynamic cache in the sense
that when the client "gets interested" in a certain entry,
the client allways makes a Persistent Search ?

Shall the LCUP scale for such situations ? The implementation
of LCUP can then not be:

	Whenever an entry is modified go through all the Searches
	and act.
	
At least an index is needed to find the relevant Searches.

Is the scalability a standardisation issue at all ? 

Jukka Aakula