Re: Updating "core" specification

["Chris Apple" <imcapple@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's simple enough to do. We'll add it near the
paragraph that talks about X.500 - LDAP alignment
unless there are a substantial number of objections
to doing so posted to the list.

Chris.

Currently self-employed pondering the meaning of life in Olde City,
Philadelphia, PA, US, Earth
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Chris Apple" <imcapple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ietf-Ldup@Imc. Org" <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: Updating "core" specification


> At 09:13 AM 2001-11-16, Chris Apple wrote:
> >And also I ask that the charter be clarified as to the
> >extent of work this WG is undertaking (or intends to
> >undertake).  In particular, the charter should state
> >whether or not the group intends to:
> > 1) Update LDAPv3 "core" specification (including
> >    its normative references),
> >
> >John's and my position on that issue are very clear.
> >We believe that this is a technical issue that should be
> >discussed in the context of documents which may or
> >may not actually attempt to do this. I have not seen similar
> >concerns raised by any other working group member.
>
> I then ask that you clarify this in the charter.  That is,
> add something like:
>   This group may update the LDAPv3 "core" specification
>   as necessary to deliver LDAP Replication.
>
> Kurt
>
>