Re: LCUP Issue: UUID

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 09:48 AM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>The syntax of UUID is directory string, and moreover, the matching rule
>is case ignore match. I see this as overly limiting and suggest that the
>syntax be changed to octet string. This is made even more apparent by
>the fact that this document leaves standardization of the value
>generation to a future specification.

I suggest a couple of comments regarding UUID.

First and foremost, UUID support needs to be mandatory.  The
protocol won't work otherwise.

I also suggest that, instead of returning the UUID as an
attribute value (which are subject to normal access controls),
it should be returned within the control (which *should* be
subject to some kind of access restrictions).  This to
avoid having to deal with no UUID as being a valid
response to a CRITICAL update request.  Instead, if the
server is unwilling to provide the UUID, the CRITICAL
request will fail.

I do believe a specification of how the server represents
UUIDs (and CSNs) in the directory should be standardized,
but suggest this be done in a separate document... as,
if UUIDs are passed in the control, LCUP doesn't depend
on the particulars representation in the DIT.

For the specifications of entryUUID (and entryCSN) I suggest
using either octetString/octetStringMatch or UUID/UUIDMatch
(where UUID was a constrained OCTET STRING with a string
syntax).  I prefer the latter.

There is no need to leave the string syntax up to future
standardization.  ISO/IEC 11578:1996 can be referenced.

Kurt