[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent

To: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 21:03:31 -0700
Cc: <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 08:09 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>Isn't that what the stateUpdate boolean is used for? Maybe the draft
>should instruct the client to not assume that the search result entry
>represents a change of any kind

No.  The stateUpdate flag is a control which must be attached
to an entry.  There may be no entries to send.

Kurt

References:
- Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
  - From: Jim Sermersheim

Prev by Date: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Next by Date: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Previous by thread: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Next by thread: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread