[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

LCUP issue: Is the EntryUpdateControlValue optional?

To: <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
Subject: LCUP issue: Is the EntryUpdateControlValue optional?
From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 22:48:53 -0600
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

First, is the EntryUpdateControlValue supposed to be returned during an
initial synchronization session?
Next, Section 4.8 states: "Each SearchResultEntry may have an
entryUpdate control attached. ". This indicates that the control is
optional. Is it?

Jim

Prev by Date: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Next by Date: LCUP issue: What is "a while"?
Previous by thread: LCUP issue: Does entryDeleted break the protocol?
Next by thread: LCUP issue: What is "a while"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread