[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent

To: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 22:11:26 -0700
Cc: <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 09:45 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>>What if no entry (presently) matches the filter?
>
>Good point. This was a defect in psearch, and hasn't been resolved yet
>in LCUP. We assumed that in this case, the operation fails with no such
>entry.

Yikes... noSuchObject should only be used to indicate that the
baseObject of the search request was not located.

Kurt

References:
- Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
  - From: Jim Sermersheim

Prev by Date: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
Next by Date: Re: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
Previous by thread: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Next by thread: Re: LCUP: updating cookie when no entries are to be sent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread