Re: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired

["Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I suppose the benefit is that in the event entries have been deleted, or
are not in the result set anymore, this two-step process lets the client
know that it's current cache may be inconsistent with the entries in the
directory.

>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 09/03/02 11:03PM >>>

Why is this error needed? It seems that if this scenario exists, the
server would simply send the full set of entries, and a new cookie.
The
current specification indicates that the client would try to sync,
receive an error, then try to sync again with an empty cookie. Is
there
a benefit to the extra step?

Jim