[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist

To: <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
Subject: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist
From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 23:23:46 -0600
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Why is there a suggestion in Section 6 to "perform an initial
synchronization...(synchronizeOnly)" and then immediately perform a
synchronizeAndPersist session? Why not just perform a
synchronizeAndPersist session to begin with?

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist
  - From: Kurt D. Zeilenga

Prev by Date: Re: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
Next by Date: Re: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
Previous by thread: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
Next by thread: Re: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread