[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)

To: <ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 23:18:42 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <sd754458.018@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 10:36 PM 2002-09-03, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>At 10:20 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>>The scenario I was thinking of is one where the base existed when a
>>persistent LCUP session starts, but later is renamed or deleted.
>
>LCUP should be clear on the expected behavior here...

Client Considerations implies noSuchObject is
returned in this case.  This needs to be detailed
in Section 4 (along with many other protocol
details found in sections 6 and 7).

References:
- LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)
  - From: Kurt D. Zeilenga

Prev by Date: Re: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist
Next by Date: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
Previous by thread: LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)
Next by thread: RE: LCUP: rename of baseObject (was something else)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread