Re: LCUP issue: sync, then sync and persist

["Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, seems like this could be done with another field on the update
control.

Jim

>>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/04/02 12:11AM >>>

At 10:51 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:

>I don't get it... A synchronizeAndPersist session should return the
>complete copy, then drop into the "persist" mode. What am I missing?

A sync to persist transition notification.


>Jim
>
>>>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/03/02 11:50PM >>>
>At 10:23 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>>Why is there a suggestion in Section 6 to "perform an initial
>>synchronization...(synchronizeOnly)" and then immediately perform a
>>synchronizeAndPersist session? Why not just perform a
>>synchronizeAndPersist session to begin with?
>
>Because the client has no other way to determine that
>it presently has a complete copy of the DIT fragment.
>
>Kurt