[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?

To: mcs@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark C Smith)
Subject: Re: LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 12:58:46 -0700
Cc: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 12:20 PM 2002-09-04, Mark C Smith wrote:
>A related comment: perhaps section 5 should be moved to an appendix that is named "Features Left Out of LCUP." It is not core to LCUP, but is useful to provide historical context and rationale for why some things are not included in LCUP.

I concur.

Kurt

References:
- LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?
  - From: Jim Sermersheim
- Re: LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?
  - From: Mark C Smith

Prev by Date: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
Next by Date: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
Previous by thread: Re: LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?
Next by thread: Re: LCUP issue: trigger mechanism or not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread