[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: LCUP Issue: UUID

To: "Liben, Michael (GTS)" <mliben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 09:42:22 -0700
Cc: "'John McMeeking'" <jmcmeek@xxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx, owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "'steven.legg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <steven.legg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <9B5CBD4986A9D511BE2100065B045DDF0238BE00@ehope21.hew.us.ml .com>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 09:18 AM 2002-09-05, Liben, Michael (GTS) wrote:
>In a nutshell, I believe the node address component is no longer sufficient to guarantee uniqueness of a uuid.

By itself, yes...  however, I believe ISO/IEC 11578:1996
adequately addresses this very old UUID issue.

Kurt

Prev by Date: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
Next by Date: RE: LCUP issue: What is "a while"?
Previous by thread: RE: LCUP Issue: UUID
Next by thread: LCUP Issue: Cookie problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread