Re: LDAPv3 Replication Access Control Design Team Report

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:34 PM 2002-09-10, Richard Huber wrote:
>If access controls are being used in a directory, the directory administrator has decided that it is important to
>control access to all or part of the data in the tree.  So if replication is used in a directory that has access
>controls, there needs to be a way to make sure that those access controls are not lost because of replication.

It not sufficient to just ensure access controls are not lost because
of replication.  http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01261.html

>A standard access control mechanism for all LDAP directories is one way to do this.

A standard access control mechanism, by itself, is not sufficient.
See above article.

>But it can also be done by
>making sure that the ACM in effect for any given part of the DIT is well defined, and that the definition can be
>carried as part of the data being replicated.

Likewise, a standard framework for non-standard ACMs, by itself,
is not sufficient.

Kurt