Re: Single-Master Failover Recovery and Automated Replication

[Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Granted, multi-master is a solution to single master recovery - there still
 isn't yet a formalized protocol specification for LDAP multi-master
replication.  Sorry if it wasn't clear that I was talking specifically
about LDAP (not X.500) and standardized, open protocols at the LDAP layer.

Zach

---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:53:32 -0700
>From: John Merrells <merrells@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
>Subject: Re: Single-Master Failover Recovery and Automated Replication  
>To: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Hugo Tavares <htavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx
>
>
>
>Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>>Designing a
>>recovery protocol that encompasses all of these options is a rather large
>>problem, which is probably why it hasn't been formalized yet (at least not
>>in a public forum).
>>
>Well, I'd argue that multi-master is the solution to the single-master 
>recovery
>problem... so a solution has been formalized in a public forum.
>
>John
>
>
>

"A plague upon all your houses" - last words of Waldo Semon, inventor of vinyl