Re: Single-Master Failover Recovery and Automated Replication

[John Merrells <merrells@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Zachary Amsden wrote:

> Granted, multi-master is a solution to single master recovery - there still
> isn't yet a formalized protocol specification for LDAP multi-master
> replication.  Sorry if it wasn't clear that I was talking specifically
> about LDAP (not X.500) and standardized, open protocols at the LDAP layer.
Why do you view the ldup drafts as not being 'a formalized protocol 
specification
for LDAP multi-master replication'?

(Sorry to sound like eliza but I've been off the list for a couple of 
years and am only
just getting back into this...)

John