Re: LCUP and eventual convergence

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:24 PM 5/1/2003, Rich Megginson wrote:
>If the current LCUP wording is not sufficient to convey this mandate, then may I ask for a suggestion of how to reword it?

        In response to an LCUP request, the server SHALL either:
                a) generate the sequence of messages necessary for
                   eventual convergence of the client's copy of
                   the content to the server's copy of the content,

                b) indicate that a reload is required by returning
                   lcupReloadRequired, or

                c) return an resultCode other than success or
                  lcupReloadRequired.

Kurt