[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt

To: mcs@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark C Smith)
Subject: Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 12:15:04 -0700
Cc: John McGarvey <mcgarvey@xxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-ldup@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-ldup.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ldup-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-ldup@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 11:01 AM 5/6/2003, Mark C Smith wrote:
>I believe it is inevitable that there will be some pain associated with certain kinds of LDAP extensions (MMR, transactional support, etc.) But I think the pain is worth bearing in some cases in order to progress the state of the art. 

There are certainly works which propose changes to the LDAP
Models under the guise of an LDAP extension.  However, I think
we should lift this guise from all such proposals and treat
them not as extension proposals but as protocol revision proposals.

Kurt

References:
- Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
  - From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
  - From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
  - From: Mark C Smith

Prev by Date: Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
Next by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldup-sync-02.txt
Previous by thread: Re: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
Next by thread: RE: draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread