[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: MD5, SHA-0

> > That said, LTANS does need to worry about what happens if 
> the notary 
> > has the hash of the document.  If the hash gets broken, it 
> dilutes the 
> > document existence claim.
> 
> No. Apply a new time-stamp token with a new hash function.

For what data should a new time-stamp token based on a new hash function be
obtained?  In this thread, the question related to the case where the notary
has only a hash of the original document.