[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notary services requirements -- directions?
> Richard,
>
> > I appreciate the feedback. I would suggest, however, that because the term
> > "Notary" is legally defined and most states actually have criminal penalties
> > for misappropriating the term or claiming to be a Notary when one is not,
> > the term is less flexible than you suggest. In fact, we are facing a serious
> > problem right now in the Western states over the issue of using the term
> > "Notario Publico" inappropriately. In Latin America, a Notario Publico is,
> > generally speaking, an attorney; in the US, a Notary Public is a ministerial
> > official of the court. Many citizens are being misled by scam artists
> > preying upon general confusion of the two terms.
>
> This is a real problem indeed. Why not use the term eNotary or e-Notary
> instead ?
>
Would this change a lot?
A little bit of history:
C. Adams(Entrust Technologies)
R. Zuccherato(Entrust Technologies)
February 27, 1997
Notary Protocols
<draft-adams-notary-01.txt>
became:
C. Adams(Entrust Technologies)
R. Zuccherato(Entrust Technologies)
June 4, 1998
Data Certification Server Protocols
<draft-adams-dcs-00.txt>
and later
Network Working Group C. Adams
Request for Comments: 3029 Entrust Technologies
Category: Experimental P. Sylvester
EdelWeb SA - Groupe ON-X Consulting
M. Zolotarev
Baltimore Technologies Pty Limited
R. Zuccherato
Entrust Technologies
February 2001
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Data Validation and Certification Server Protocols
I don't know why the first change occured, but at least it avoids at
least two problems.