RE: Notary services requirements -- directions?

["Carl Wallace" <cwallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Is there an additional need to define means for 
> representing notarial 
> > acts performed by humans?
> > 
> No. The best is to have the equivalent of a framework paper 
> that has a free form text place where the nature of the 
> notarial act and anything else can be noted.
> 
> These elements are not subject to automatic treatment by our 
> core protocol
> 
> it may be useful to more than  "free' text, i.e. some schema 
> or oid based document piece like for soap content or CMS 
> content types, in order to allow plugin logic do additional 
> work for semantic validation in a correct way. 

Seems like part of you says "No" and another part says "Yes":-)  A schema,
or some such, might be a useful parallel to the signature formats, bindings
and certification protocol.