Re: Discussion of notareqs document

[Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>]

Paul-André,

(text deleted)

> This is another proof of the sound approach of LTANS which links "data 
> certs" and "secure archived". Any "data cert" must not only be signed, 
> but a detailed log entry must be archived in a secure way (non 
> rewritable medium, hash linking). This mandatory combination was a major 
> rationale of the openevidence project (the technical solution by then 
> was a a combination of TSP RFC3061, DVCS RFC3029 and hash-linking)

There is no such mandatory comnbination for LTANS: data needs to be signed 
(and time-stamped) by the archive service, but the log is not intended to be 
used as an evidence.

Denis