Re: LTANS: ERS - question for consensus about the mentioning of other TS Services (other than RFC3161) in the I-D

["Young H. Etheridge" <yhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Carl Wallace wrote:
>    
>   
> > Do you have ASN.1 code envisioned for this mechanism?
> >     
>
> Not at the moment but I can provide some.
>  
>   
> > Does the X9.95 TimeStampToken Verification protocol for each 
> > of the TSTs not address your concerns?
> >     
>
> No.  The material needed to perform the validation must come from somewhere.
> That somewhere has not been defined.
>
>   
Are you suggesting that the EncapulatedContentInfo with Optional Content 
needs a URL/URI to the DigestedData/SignedData/MACData/... and/or 
possibly a URL/URI to at least one potential Verification subscriber 
service?  Are these not problems for CMS consumers now?  Or, am I 
missing some other point?