RE: Clarification of ISO-IEC 18014 documents

I agree with Carl.

Young, if you like, feel free to invite me to the ISO discussions and I will be happy to present ERS there.

And second I am not sure I understood your initial email correctly: Do you propose to add some new text to ERS, or was this just a clarification for the mailing list?

(if the first is the case, as I would not want to miss any requests for change to the ERS, please send the proposed text and section again.)

Tobias

From: owner-ietf-ltans@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf-ltans@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Wallace
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Young H Etheridge
Cc: ietf-ltans@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Clarification of ISO-IEC 18014 documents

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Young H Etheridge [mailto:yhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Clarification of ISO-IEC 18014 documents
>
> Yes, the spec is rather opaque in that regard. Fortunately,
> 18014-1-revised will do so.
>
> It seems to me that aggregation would need to be built into
> extRenewal or other EXTENSIONS in a standard way.

So the ISO spec would need to be enhanced and ported into the IETF. ERS achieves these ends now and is already there.

> I agree the opportunity for change has been waiting about for
> well over a year. How many applications are ready for this
> draft to be a standard?

Several implementations have been cited on the list and at the WG meetings over the last year or so. There is also an XML version out there (Aleksej?).