Comment on draft-ietf-ltans-xmlers-03.txt

["Andreas Menke" <andreas.menke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello list.

Point 4.2.1. Time Stamp Renewal in 'draft-ietf-ltans-xmlers-03.txt' is
irritating me: Is it right that 'the complete content of the last ATS MUST
be time-stamped...'?

RFC4998 point 5.2 says 'the content of the timeStamp field
   of the old Archive Timestamp has to be hashed and timestamped by a
   new Archive Timestamp [...] generally one can collect a number of
   old Archive Timestamps and build the new hash tree with the hash
   values of the content of their timeStamp fields.'

Is it right that there should be no conversion between XML and RFC4998
coding ever since working with different hash values?

Is it right that a collection of 'a number of old Archive Timestamps and
build the new hash tree' is not supported by XML coding in contrast to
RFC4998?

In 2.1 Structure there seems to be shown a structure which does not
correspond to the schema in 6. Is it right to assume that the schema in 6.
is what is meant?


Regards


Andreas Menke

-----------------------------
Diplom-Informatiker (Uni.)
Andreas Menke
Team Leader, Development

OPENLiMiT SignCubes GmbH
Saarbrücker Str. 38 A
D-10405 Berlin

Fon: +49 30 868 766 – 10
Fax: +49 30 868 766 – 11
andreas.menke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.openlimit.com

Geschäftsführer:
Heinrich Dattler, Armin Lunkeit
Nadine Model (Prokuristin)
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 86352 B
Finanzamt für Körperschaften II
St.-Nr. 37/155/20819
USt-ID: DE 224136339
---

Erleben Sie, wie einfach es ist, elektronisch zu unterschreiben und testen
Sie die neue Signatur-Software OpenLimit CC Sign 2.5 für 30 Tage kostenlos.
Hier downloaden:
https://www.openlimit.com/de/produkte/cc-sign/download-cc-sign-testversion.h
tml