Archive of ietf-mailsig, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-mailsig

Page 2 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

RE: Policy Mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/27/2005
Re: Policy Mechanisms, Michael Thomas, 07/27/2005
Policy Mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/27/2005
Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/27/2005
Re: The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 07/27/2005
Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas, 07/27/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/27/2005
RE: The cost of choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/27/2005
Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 07/27/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/27/2005
Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 07/27/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Thomas Roessler, 07/27/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, SM, 07/27/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, John R Levine, 07/26/2005
Re: The cost of choices, Hector Santos, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hector Santos, 07/26/2005
Re: The cost of choices, william(at)elan.net, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Dave Crocker, 07/26/2005
The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, James Scott, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Michael Thomas, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/26/2005
Header field canonicalzation question, Bryan Costales, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Earl Hood, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Earl Hood, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Michael Thomas, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, wayne, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Ned Freed, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, william(at)elan.net, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Ned Freed, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Thomas Roessler, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, SM, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Arvel Hathcock, 07/26/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/26/2005
Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/26/2005
Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/26/2005
Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Thomas Roessler, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Frank Ellermann, 07/26/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hector Santos, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hector Santos, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hector Santos, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Frank Ellermann, 07/25/2005
QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, wayne, 07/25/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, James Scott, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/25/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 07/25/2005
PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
RE: accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
RE: accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Earl Hood, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, SM, 07/25/2005
RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Dennis Dayman, 07/25/2005
Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Hector Santos, 07/25/2005
accreditation, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/25/2005
Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Ned Freed, 07/25/2005
QUERY: Key Server Choices, Dave Crocker, 07/25/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/25/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/25/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Michael Thomas, 07/25/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 07/25/2005
DKIM Body Count/Length, Hector Santos, 07/24/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 07/24/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Sam Hartman, 07/24/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 07/24/2005
Re: Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), Jim Fenton, 07/24/2005
DKIM - New form of Social Engineering Spam?, Hector Santos, 07/24/2005
Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/24/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Hector Santos, 07/23/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Earl Hood, 07/22/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Jim Fenton, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/22/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07/22/2005
Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Arvel Hathcock, 07/22/2005
Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Jim Fenton, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/22/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/22/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 07/22/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 07/22/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Thomas Roessler, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 07/21/2005
RE: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, wayne, 07/21/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hector Santos, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 07/21/2005
RE: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/21/2005
Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, william(at)elan.net, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 07/21/2005
Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Arvel Hathcock, 07/21/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Tony Hansen, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/21/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/21/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Thomas Roessler, 07/21/2005
Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, Thomas Roessler, 07/21/2005
Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Jim Fenton, 07/20/2005
Re: Restricted Third Party Signing Policy, Jim Fenton, 07/20/2005
Restricted Third Party Signing Policy, James Scott, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Frank Ellermann, 07/20/2005
Re: XINDX, Frank Ellermann, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/20/2005
Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, Jim Fenton, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Jim Fenton, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 07/20/2005
DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Eric Allman, 07/20/2005
DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Hector Santos, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Eric Allman, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, SM, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 07/20/2005
RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
RE: Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Real use cases for justify nowsp? (was Re: nowsp considered harmful), Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: dkim-base-00: misc. comments, Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
RE: Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/20/2005
Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 07/20/2005
Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Ned Freed, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
XINDX, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/20/2005
Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Tony Hansen, 07/20/2005
RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/20/2005
Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 07/20/2005
RE: revised Proposed Charter, Kuhtz, Christian, 07/20/2005
revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Tony Hansen, 07/20/2005
dkim-base-00: misc. comments, Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
Re: nowsp considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 07/20/2005
draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 07/20/2005
DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Earl Hood, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: Additional Key Management Methods RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/19/2005
Re: Goldilocks Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Hector Santos, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Jon Callas, 07/19/2005
RE: DKIM - Header Fields, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Douglas Otis, 07/19/2005
RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Douglas Otis, 07/19/2005
Additional Key Management Methods RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/19/2005
RE: DKIM - Version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/19/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Thomas Roessler, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07/19/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
RE: DKIM - Version, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, wayne, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/18/2005
Re: Goldilocks Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Ned Freed, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Goldilocks Canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Version, Jim Fenton, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Other Inconsistancies, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
RE: DKIM - Version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Version, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Frank Ellermann, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Jim Fenton, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Jim Fenton, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Miles Libbey, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Douglas Otis, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 07/18/2005
MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Dave Crocker, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Arvel Hathcock, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 07/18/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
operations and development dkim mailing lists, Dave Crocker, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Tony Hansen, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 07/18/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Dave Crocker, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Douglas Otis, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Dave Crocker, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 07/17/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/17/2005
RE: wildcards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Dave Crocker, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 07/17/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/17/2005
Re: wildcards, Michael Thomas, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/17/2005
Re: wildcards, John Levine, 07/17/2005
Re: Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
RE: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dennis Dayman, 07/17/2005
Re: Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/17/2005
Re: Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07/17/2005
Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 07/17/2005
Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, william(at)elan.net, 07/17/2005
Re: wildcards, John Levine, 07/17/2005
RE: Why DKIM useful and different from PGP or S/MIME, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/17/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/16/2005
Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/16/2005
Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/16/2005
Re: IPR declaration requirement, william(at)elan.net, 07/16/2005
Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/16/2005
Re: IPR declaration requirement, Ned Freed, 07/16/2005
Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 07/16/2005
Options and alternatives, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
Why DKIM useful and different from PGP or S/MIME, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
IPR declaration requirement, Dave Crocker, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, wayne, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, SM, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, SM, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07/16/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Michael Thomas, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Douglas Otis, 07/16/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, wayne, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
RE: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hector Santos, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John R Levine, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Jim Fenton, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM, wayne, 07/15/2005
RE: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: signer address, Jim Fenton, 07/15/2005
RE: DKIM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, wayne, 07/15/2005
RE: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM, wayne, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Douglas Otis, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
RE: Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John R Levine, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Tony Hansen, 07/15/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, wayne, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen, 07/15/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/15/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Frank Ellermann, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Michael Thomas, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
DKIM: signer address, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 07/15/2005
Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John Levine, 07/15/2005
DKIM: Canonicalization, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/14/2005
DKIM: Key revocation, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/14/2005
DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/14/2005
DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/14/2005
Re: dkim technology?, Douglas Otis, 07/14/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 07/14/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 07/14/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/14/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/14/2005
RE: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/14/2005
RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Ned Freed, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 07/14/2005
Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 07/14/2005
MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
[Sam Hartman] Please post BOF agenda and proposed charter, Sam Hartman, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Sam Hartman, 07/14/2005
Re: dkim technology?, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: dkim technology?, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: dkim technology?, wayne, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Justin Mason, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Chip Mefford, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Andrew Newton, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Chip Mefford, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Jim Fenton, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, william(at)elan.net, 07/14/2005
dkim technology?, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, william(at)elan.net, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Arvel Hathcock, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, David Woodhouse, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, David Woodhouse, 07/14/2005
Re: DKIM licensing, Arvel Hathcock, 07/13/2005
DKIM licensing, Justin Mason, 07/13/2005
Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton, 07/13/2005
Listing of DKIM implementations, Dave Crocker, 07/12/2005
Re: DKIM, Andrew Newton, 07/12/2005
Re: DKIM, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, Arvel Hathcock, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, Andrew Newton, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, Dave Crocker, 07/11/2005
Content-Digest & Edigest fields draft, william(at)elan.net, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, Michael Weiner, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, David Woodhouse, 07/11/2005
Re: DKIM, wayne, 07/11/2005
DKIM, Dave Crocker, 07/10/2005
Answers to the escaping issue, Andrew Newton, 07/08/2005
Re: What am I missing?, Andrew Newton, 07/07/2005
Re: What am I missing?, Michael Thomas, 07/07/2005
Re: What am I missing?, Hector Santos, 07/07/2005

Page 2 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.