Re: DKIM licensing

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 08:38 -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Either the new BSD licence (no advertising clause), or LGPL would
> > probably be best.
> 
> Ours is up now on Sourceforge under a BSD-like license.

Unfortunately still not GPL-compatible due to the advertising clause.

3. Redistributions of the Software in binary form must reproduce the
   Copyright Notice described below, these license terms and conditions,
   and the disclaimer/limitation of liability set forth in paragraph
   6 below, in the documentation and/or other materials provided with
   the binary distribution.  For the purposes of binary distribution,
   "Copyright Notice" refers to the following language: "Copyright (c)
   1998-2004 Sendmail, Inc. All rights reserved."

Not entirely sure about clause 5 either.

-- 
dwmw2