[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter
In <> Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> First, is the intent of this WG to create standard track RFCs? I
>> believe the MARID WG was chartered to do so.
> The draft charter specifies the goals of the working group.
Uh, yeah, but I don't think that answers my question.
> Is this something that
>> is normally decided on after the BOF?
> the draft bof agenda covers this.
It does? I don't see it...
>> Secondly, this appears to be aimed at, basically, rubber stamping the
>> DKIM drafts. Is there any real point in people outside the DKIM
>> design committee contributing anything?
> the ietf does not do rubber-stamping.
Ok, but the language of the draft charter are pretty strict:
The specification will be based on the <draft-*-dkim-*.txt> draft
documents and will make only the minimal changes deemed essential
to the viability of the service.