Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter

[wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In <> Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>  First, is the intent of this WG to create standard track RFCs?  I
>>  believe the MARID WG was chartered to do so. 
>
> The draft charter specifies the goals of the working group.

Uh, yeah, but I don't think that answers my question.

>  Is this something that
>>  is normally decided on after the BOF?
>
> the draft bof agenda covers this.

It does?  I don't see it...

>>  Secondly, this appears to be aimed at, basically, rubber stamping the
>>  DKIM drafts.  Is there any real point in people outside the DKIM
>>  design committee contributing anything?
>
> the ietf does not do rubber-stamping.

Ok, but the language of the draft charter are pretty strict:

   The specification will be based on the <draft-*-dkim-*.txt> draft
   documents and will make only the minimal changes deemed essential
   to the viability of the service.


-wayne