Re: wildcards

[Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

wayne wrote:

> somewhat off topic because SPF has never proposed tree walks

Minus version 3 of the op= draft with an op=nosub (that was
the raw idea as posted by John on CLEAR, not the elaborated
"up to six levels excl. the TLD" later in the CSV -02 drafts).

> I suspect the depth of dislike for tree walks was not fully
> revealed.

Without limiting the levels it could be clumsy and expensive,
and with a limit the question is _which_ limit.

> we should probably wander over to namedroppers and raise
> this issue now.  And, by "we", I think it would be best if
> one or more of the major authors of the I-Ds does it

Makes sense.  Bye, Frank