[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> somewhat off topic because SPF has never proposed tree walks
Minus version 3 of the op= draft with an op=nosub (that was
the raw idea as posted by John on CLEAR, not the elaborated
"up to six levels excl. the TLD" later in the CSV -02 drafts).
> I suspect the depth of dislike for tree walks was not fully
Without limiting the levels it could be clumsy and expensive,
and with a limit the question is _which_ limit.
> we should probably wander over to namedroppers and raise
> this issue now. And, by "we", I think it would be best if
> one or more of the major authors of the I-Ds does it
Makes sense. Bye, Frank