[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DKIM: Canonicalization
- To: "IETF MASS WG" <ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: DKIM: Canonicalization
- From: "Arvel Hathcock" <arvel@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:58:42 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=altn.com; s=c3po; l=145; t=1121900381; x=1122505181; i=arvel@altn.com; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date: Organization:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=T5jjcva0+u2lvvo7E2P6lfJCWuc/V4J0ghSJ RvEG6wqSsksfCjTsv/hHJlZnEKi6yOSXa1gGn+5YvwD4oqvdi7y75I8dmAbnKU1V Ssx73Qj5S7b47WkzohOuxOveUYu7AMokjDeeWprIsGWMVJcExu2liwsquEPT9cow 9dxCSgA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=c3po; d=altn.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=dtdH9aOi/Y2+Gxptn6ZdysGxCpwXnLKkIjzk32KBgTccfCiVLZnx3XvbCXzxbFHMi5LvF5rseNZG2sK+kydMcIbZL9orjB5Usg48nlZnqEakF++oLNabiykW5DE5vVJAFuIjkVEdUyzv397AXUebaQwkpbyQlgLI5jzy+o72P00=;
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mailsig/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <ietf-mailsig.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mailsig-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- Organization: Alt-N Technologies
- References: <> <> <> <> <>
- Reply-to: "Arvel Hathcock" <arvel@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Because each signature data needs to be unique based on hash of the
message.
I see, so the headers would not provide a sufficient level of uniqueness in
themselves.
--
Arvel