[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: revised Proposed Charter
> It seems to me that there are two possible effects a limited
> charter can produce. One that precludes further work in a
> given direction, and one that allows that further work to
> happen in the future. Now, nobody's omniscient so the latter
> is always a calculated risk, but it sure seems to me that
> DKIM with respect to reputation is in the latter rather than
> former category. I for one would be rather dismayed if it did
> not lend itself well to reputation/accredation systems. It
> seems to me that the risk is pretty low, so divide and
> conquer seems more prudent.
There is a third effect that I have seen in WS-Security. The original
charter is so over-constrained leading to excessive debate over minutiae
and the whole process is slowed rather than speeded up.