RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> [mailto:owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Earl Hood

> I do NOT believe that anyone is stating that something like 
> xkms or joebob PKI method must be supported to be DKIM 
> compliant.  It can be specified that to be DKIM compliant, 
> only the DNS method must be supported.  Alternative methods 
> are considered extensions and only need to be supported if a 
> DKIM adopter/implementor chooses to do so.

I am certainly not suggesting a mandatory mechanism.

What I am suggesting is nothing more than defining a q value that
parties that already have an XKMS server can use.