Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed

["Hector Santos" <hsantos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Thomas" <mike@xxxxxxxx>

> >According to the specs (as I read it):
> >
> >   a:X<CRLF>b:YZ<CRLF><CRLF>CDE
> >   <CRLF>dkim-signature:a=rsa-sha1;d=example.net;
> >   s=brisbane;c=simple;q=dns;i=@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;h=A:B;
> >
> >Does this look right?
>
> it looks like you're missing the final b=. that is, it should be
>
> a:[...];h=A:B;b=

Ok, finally. That did it!   (Dave, the docs should show the example of a
full set of canonicalized characters like above with Mike's adjustment).

> (assuming that b= was the last item; Arvel brought up a good point about
its
> value if it's not).

True.  A repercussion of a developer's coding method/style. <g>

> if you send a message to dkim-test@xxxxxxxx, it will show you my verify
> side's idea of the canonicalized bytes.

I'll check this out.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com