[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: revised Proposed Charter




I think it seems a little silly but it's not harmful so I personally don't care either way. It's sort of basically saying, "Hey, guess what! Some DNS records are larger than others - yeah, they're not all the same size." LOL. DNS has well known constraints; we are operating within those constraints. Someday there should be a "Friendly Advice" or "Take it from me brother!" section in every RFC. If there were, this text would belong there rather than in "Security Considerations" (just my opinion folks).


--
Arvel


----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Andrew Newton" <andy@xxxxxx>
Cc: "IETF MASS WG" <ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: revised Proposed Charter




Public keys stored in DNS records are much larger than DNS records

tnx.


how do folks feel about including this?


d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net