Re: revised Proposed Charter

[Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>  The charter implies that the
>  initial deliverable will be based on a DNS PKI, but that does not
>  prohibit developing specs that support alternatives in the future.
>  Right now, the draft is written with alternatives/extensions in mind,
>  but I think it could use some "beefing up" in this area.
>
> >  The existence of this tag automatically opens up DKIM to alternative key
> >  storage/retrieval mechanisms.
> >
>  Yep, and the draft implies this, but in a restrictive matter; mainly
>  due to the wording chosen.  The wording is limited to "retrieving
>  the public key".


what changes to the languge of the charter are suggested?

what changes to the language of the specification are suggested?

  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net