RE: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That does not help from a legal point of view.

A set of slides presented at a meeting in Paris does not constitute
actual notice of the IPR requirements. It does not even constitute
constructive notice.

On the other hand sticking the IPR notice into the Web subscription form
and Mailman confirmation request would.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 1:59 AM
> To: IETF MASS WG; IETF MASS WG
> Subject: Re: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary
> 
> 
> 
> >  session that this would be a good time to require the IPR NOTE WELL
> 
> take a look at the session slides at dkim.org.
> 
> 
>   d/
>   ---
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   +1.408.246.8253
>   dcrocker  a t ...
>   WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
>