RE: [ietf-dkim] Purpose and sequence forDKIM specification and deployment

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am also interested in working on SSP. I have spent quite a bit of time
looking at how to use SSP to help manage protocol transitions.

I also helped write a similar set of specs for the Web Services world.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ietf-mailsig@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arvel Hathcock
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:26 PM
> To: ietf-mailsig
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Purpose and sequence forDKIM 
> specification and deployment
> 
> 
> 
> > Perhaps divide and conquor is the best approach.  I'll volunteer to 
> > work
> > on the SSP group with others who think that's important.  
> One group can 
> > work out what threats DKIM-base deals with and the others what the 
> > addition of DKIM-SSP can deal with.  Then we can merge them.
> 
> I volunteer to work on DKIM-SSP also.  It is critically 
> important if the 
> prevention of unauthorized domain use in message headers is 
> the issue.  I've 
> posted up a couple of times already the specific problems SSP 
> deals with. 
> We could offer those as input into the threat analysis.
> 
> --
> Arvel
> 
> 
> 
> 
>