Archive of ietf-mailsig, by thread

• Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, (continued)
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton
  • Requiring no MIME support, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Requiring no MIME support, Jim Fenton
  • Re: Requiring no MIME support, Dave Crocker
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin
  • Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Dave Crocker
  • Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John Levine
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John R Levine
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Miles Libbey
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John R Levine
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Jim Fenton
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Tony Finch
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, David Woodhouse
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, william(at)elan.net
  • RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James Scott
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, David Woodhouse
  • Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Andrew Newton
  • Re: Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
    • Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, ned . freed
    • charter constraints list, Dave Crocker
    • Re: charter constraints list, ned . freed
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Dave Crocker
    • RE: charter constraints list, Miles Libbey
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, George Gross
    • RE: charter constraints list, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
    • RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas
    • RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman
    • RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas
    • RE: charter constraints list, william(at)elan.net
    • Re: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton
    • anonymity, Tony Finch
    • Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, Jim Fenton
    • Re: Why we don't require requirements, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Why we don't require requirements, Michael Thomas
    • Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
  • RE: Why we don't require requirements, Paul Lambert
    • RE: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin
• mailing list for CSV/BATV pre-standards discussions, Dave Crocker
• candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
  • Re: candidate MASS charter, Miles Libbey
    • Re: candidate MASS charter, Tony Finch
  • Re: candidate MASS charter, David Mayne
    • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, David Mayne
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, SM
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, John Levine
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Mark Baugher
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, SM
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Jim Fenton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, John Levine
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, ned . freed
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Andrew Newton
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: candidate MASS charter, william(at)elan.net
  • whither parametric information, James M Galvin
    • Re: whither parametric information, Dave Crocker
      • Re: whither parametric information, James M Galvin
  • Re: candidate MASS charter, Jim Fenton
    • Re: candidate MASS charter, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: candidate MASS charter, Paul Lambert
• plans for Washington, Steve Bellovin
  • What's in the charter, John Levine
    • RE: What's in the charter, Seth Goodman
    • Re: What's in the charter, william(at)elan.net
    • Re: What's in the charter, Dave Crocker
    • RE: What's in the charter, Seth Goodman
    • RE: What's in the charter, Seth Goodman
    • Re: What's in the charter, Tony Finch
• RFC2821 vs. RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
  • Re: RFC2821 vs. RFC2822 signatures., David Mayne
    • Re: RFC2821 vs. RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • Re: RFC2821 vs. RFC2822 signatures., Jim Fenton
      • Re: RFC2821 vs. RFC2822 signatures., Dave Crocker
• signatures and keys -- what can one know, Miles Libbey
  • RE: signatures and keys -- what can one know, Seth Goodman
    • RE: signatures and keys -- what can one know, Michael Thomas
  • Re: signatures and keys -- what can one know, John Thielens
• FYI - US Government requesting information on E-Mail Authentication, Richard Shockey
• SES docs, Andrew Newton
  • Re: SES docs, Tony Finch
    • Re: SES docs, David Woodhouse
• User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, Andriy G. Tereshchenko
  • Re: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, william(at)elan.net
    • Re: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, Tony Finch
    • Re: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, Andrew Newton
      • Re: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, Tony Finch
      • RE: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, Seth Goodman
      • Re: User-to-User or Server-to-Server mail encryption, william(at)elan.net
• Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
  • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Miles Libbey
    • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Jim Fenton
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Andriy G. Tereshchenko
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Miles Libbey
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., william(at)elan.net
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Seth Goodman
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Seth Goodman
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Seth Goodman
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Seth Goodman
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., william(at)elan.net
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Rand Wacker
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Dave Crocker
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Dave Crocker
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., william(at)elan.net
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Jim Fenton
      • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Dave Crocker
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Jim Fenton
      • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
  • Re: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., william(at)elan.net
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Andriy G. Tereshchenko
    • RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., David Woodhouse
• at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Dave Crocker
  • at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Michael Thomas
    • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Tony Finch
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John R Levine
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Michael Thomas
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Tony Finch
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Michael Thomas
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John R Levine
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, David Woodhouse
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Michael Thomas
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Michael Thomas
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, David Woodhouse
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Dave Crocker
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Andrew Newton
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John Levine
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John Levine
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John Levine
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Dave Crocker
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, David Woodhouse
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Jim Fenton
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, David Woodhouse
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Jim Fenton
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John Levine
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Andrew Newton
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Dave Crocker
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, David Woodhouse
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • RE: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, Seth Goodman
      • Re: at last: draft-levine-mass-batv-00, John R Levine
• Early work on mail server signatures, william(at)elan.net
• Draft minutes for MASS BoF, Jim Fenton
  • Re: Draft minutes for MASS BoF, Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Draft minutes for MASS BoF, wayne
    • Re: Draft minutes for MASS BoF, Jim Fenton
• domainkeys-base-01 now available on IETF website, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
  • Re: domainkeys-base-01 now available on IETF website, Andrew Newton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: domainkeys-base-01 now available on IETF website, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
• Anonymous signed mail, Atul.Sharma
  • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Jim Fenton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Jim Fenton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Anonymous signed mail, Atul.Sharma
    • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Nathaniel Borenstein
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Richard Shockey
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Richard Shockey
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Richard Shockey
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, domainkeys-feedbackbase01
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Miles Libbey
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Miles Libbey
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, wayne
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Jim Fenton
      • costs of different approaches, Dave Crocker
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Michael Thomas
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler
      • Re: costs of different approaches, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: costs of different approaches, wayne
      • Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker
      • Re: costs of different approaches, wayne
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton
      • Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas
      • Re: the DNS issue, John Levine
• Viewgraphs from MASS BoF, Jim Fenton
• raw jabber log of MASS BoF at IETF60, Dan Wing
• Draft working group charter, Jim Fenton
  • Re: Draft working group charter, william(at)elan.net

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.