Re: Comments on draft-ietf-conneg-feature-syntax-01.txt

[Al Gilman <asgilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

to follow up on what Graham Klyne said:
> 
> I believe it is helpful to indicate a range of values, and the fact that
> higher values indicate greater levels of preference.  I think both of these
> statements are without loss of generality in terms of what further
> semantics can be applied.  I think the default value in the absence of an
> explicit value is helpful.

I second that.

Al

I also believe it might be useful to state explicitly that q=0
should be treated as "categorically unacceptable."