[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-conneg-feature-syntax-01.txt
to follow up on what Graham Klyne said:
> I believe it is helpful to indicate a range of values, and the fact that
> higher values indicate greater levels of preference. I think both of these
> statements are without loss of generality in terms of what further
> semantics can be applied. I think the default value in the absence of an
> explicit value is helpful.
I second that.
I also believe it might be useful to state explicitly that q=0
should be treated as "categorically unacceptable."