RE: Capability terminology

["McIntyre, Lloyd" <Lloyd.McIntyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dan Wing [SMTP:dwing@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Friday, November 13, 1998 1:36 PM
> To:	McIntyre, Lloyd
> Cc:	Graham Klyne; conneg WG; ietf-fax@xxxxxxx
> Subject:	RE: Capability terminology
> 
> On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, McIntyre, Lloyd wrote:
> 
> > > > I do not see the sender disclosing any of its capabilities to
> the
> > > recipient
> > > > in G3 fax.  
> > > 
> > > Doesn't the DIS go one directiona and the DCS the other direction
> > > (sender->recipient and recipient->sender)?  I'm not a fax person
> and
> > > my
> > > copy of T.30 is at home (of course) and I'm at work.  I've
> certainly
> > > been wrong before and am likely to be wrong again.
> > 	[McIntyre, Lloyd]  The DCS does not provide capability
> > information. It sets the session parameters based on the
> capabilities
> > defined in the DIS.
> 
> So:  "DIS: This is what I can receive", and "DCS: This is what I'm
> going
> to send".  Right?  
	[McIntyre, Lloyd]  Yes.

> That's an exchange.
> 
> -Dan Wing