[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Has IANA gone mad?

To: "'ietf-822 mailing list'" <ietf-822@xxxxxxx>, <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Has IANA gone mad?
From: "Scott Hollenbeck" <sah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:33:47 -0400
Cc: "'ietf-msgtrk mailing list'" <ietf-msgtrk@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-msgtrk/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-msgtrk.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-msgtrk-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-msgtrk@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcRtEAcl9lBchF8NSYuBy9UW17N9HAADojEA

> Is the registration template in the draft of a document 
> intended to become a Proposed Standard not reviewed by the 
> IESG?  Doesn't registration in the IETF tree require IESG 
> review and publication as an RFC [RFC 2048 section 2.1.1]?
> What about RFC 2048 [2.3.1] -- was this proposed registration 
> posted to the ietf-types mailing list for review (I looked at 
> the mailing list archives, but couldn't find anything in the 
> past 4 months-- but there seems to be an awful lot of spam)?

Ned was the shepherding AD before I completed the IESG actions on this
document.  He knows the history better than I do, but I can confirm (as I
said in my original reply) that this document _was_ reviewed and approved by
the IESG.  It _will_ become an RFC.  You can check the status, including all
of the relevant IESG comments and dates, using the I-D tracker:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi

-Scott-

References:
- Re: Has IANA gone mad?
  - From: Bruce Lilly

Prev by Date: Re: Has IANA gone mad?
Previous by thread: Re: Has IANA gone mad?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread