Re: mutli-line strings (again)

[Thomas Down <keeper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A while ago, Rob Earhart wrote:
> 
>   I think I'd prefer the Chris mechanism; the ANSI-C way works; I
> really don't like the LISP mechanism at all.
> 

Chris' mechanism works for me, on the condition that instead of 
differentiating between quoted strings and messages, we just have a
single type of string in the grammer, and _always_ allow either a 
quoted string or a Chris-string.

Anyone else?

Thomas
-- 
The aim of science is not to open
the door to infinite wisdom, but to
set limits to infinite error.                       -- Brecht