[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft

To: Tim Showalter <tjs+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft
From: Randall Gellens <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:36:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <>
References: <v04102e3db26f97a33f1c@129.46.219.133>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx

At 2:55 PM -0500 11/11/98, Tim Showalter wrote:

Either we need to change the grammar to allow the extension, or the
extension to fit the grammar, and I'd like to know which.

Let's use the syntax Barry suggested. Both Ned and I like it, even though each of us has implementations which use different syntax.

References:
- Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft
  - From: Tim Showalter

Prev by Date: Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft
Next by Date: Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft - Forward
Previous by thread: Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft
Next by thread: Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread